Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
" Bruen resolved the historical issue in that case by direct reference to the historical sources, with no need for experts. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Allen, Jr., New York City, of counsel.Sherman & Sterling & Wright, New York City, for Third-Party Defendant, Chemical Bank & Trust Company; John A. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:54 pm
“Book providers” means any commercial entity that offers a “service that, as its primary purpose, provides the rental, purchase, borrowing, browsing, or viewing of books. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:04 am
Characterizing VFB and Defendants as direct competitors because both make alcoholic beverages would dramatically expand the ‘zone of interest’ in which a plaintiff may sue for false advertising under the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
At the oral argument in October, the parties agreed that the case was moot. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
The plaintiff may also recover other damages, including, but not limited to, damages for waste. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
 The Court held that, in order to place the plaintiff in this position, he should be allowed to relinquish title to the RV and given damages including “the purchase price of the vehicle less the sum paid to plaintiff pursuant to case evaluation, repayment of the interest paid on the loan, and statutory interest pursuant to MCL 600.6013(8). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:55 am
” [There is a line of cases about when legal claims are falsifiable v. puffery, but the court does not cite them and might not have been directed by the parties to them.] [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Effectively controlling interests in both companies were owned by a very small number of people. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Effectively controlling interests in both companies were owned by a very small number of people. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Effectively controlling interests in both companies were owned by a very small number of people. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
“[A] party’s attempt to pass off another party’s product as its own satisfies the confusion requirement of the Lanham Act for an obvious reason—it represents a direct attempt to confuse a consumer about the origin of a product. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
Ct. 1758 (2010), which holds that class arbitration may not be imposed on a party that has not agreed to it. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
" "A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment `serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.'" Merritt Hawkins & Assocs. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
" "A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment `serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.'" Merritt Hawkins & Assocs. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
“‘Having established falsity, the plaintiff should be entitled to both injunctive and monetary relief, regardless of the extent of impact on consumer purchasing decisions’” (citation omitted). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
The Affiliated Ute presumption is unavailable when claims are based on misstatements rather than omissions, or are directed against auditors or others without a duty to the plaintiff. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
And all of these — not just some — necessarily purchased through either Fairfield’s website or its catalog. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
” This is not a case in which the parties’ marks are so similar that the consumer would initially become interested in EcoSense because it mistakenly thought EcoSense’s product was made by Suntree; the parties’ marks could not be confused. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
