Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties" Results 601 - 620 of 1,438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
For further information about the EU’s Trade Secrets Directive, please see our webinar “New Year, New Progress: 2016 Update on Defend Trade Secrets Act & EU Directive. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
  Thereafter, Savory Pie purchased another Comtec pressing machine from a third-party competitor of Comtec, InLine Pie. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:38 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
  Thereafter, Savory Pie purchased another Comtec pressing machine from a third-party competitor of Comtec, InLine Pie. [read post]
”  The district court should consider “real evidence (direct or circumstantial) and the reality of what is at stake in the litigation,” and provide each party a “fair opportunity to submit proof. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:48 pm by John Stigi
  The second transaction involved the Partnership’s purchase of the remaining 49% interest in Southern LNG and Elba Express, plus the purchase of a 15% interest in Southern Natural Gas Company. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:11 am by MBettman
(there was no properly presented claim where a plaintiff sent a written notice of his claim to a third party who then forwarded it to the executor within the six-month deadline. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am by Eric Goldman
The parties entered into a partial settlement in November 2016, with Sirius XM agreeing to pay as much as $99 million in damages to the class, contingent on the outcome of its appeals on the merits in all three cases. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:57 am by David Post
Not that “Axanar” would somehow serve as a market substitute for the original works on which it is based; the court wasn’t suggesting that people will watch/purchase “Axanar”&nb [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:16 am by MBettman
Case Background In September, 2011, Appellee James Wilson and Decedent Joseph Gorman entered into a contract in which Gorman agreed to purchase a 15% interest in Marine 1, LLC for $300,000, to be paid in a series of payments. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  To maintain a cause of action under § 1125(a), “a plaintiff must plead (and ultimately prove) an injury to a commercial interest in sales or business reputation proximately caused by the defendant’s misrepresentations. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am by Eric Goldman
That may be true—purchasing a legal education typically (and hopefully) involves months of thorough research—but this fact alone does not preclude finding a likelihood of confusion prior to the purchase (i.e., initial-interest confusion). [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:05 pm by Christopher Simon
About two years following this sale, the plaintiff’s grandmother made the aforementioned trip to CTC and purchased two new tires. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:57 am by Eric Goldman
Aug. 10, 2016): The parties spend time in their briefs arguing whether the five days it took for Level-(1) to remove the offending photographs in 2016 demonstrates that Steadfast moved expeditiously in response to Plaintiffs’ notification, which is another of the requirements for Steadfast to qualify for the safe-harbor. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:39 am by Francis Pileggi
  Together with the Heck Parties, they also asserted third-party claims against Cohen, Weinberger, Costar, and Gawi, LLC, a company involved in the purchase of Arctic Ease and Summetria (the “Cohen Parties”). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm by Jason Rantanen
The most interesting aspect of this opinion is its discussion of inducement, in which the court rejects a jury instruction on inducement that expressly stated that the third party’s direct infringement “need not have been actually caused by the [accused inducer’s] actions. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The foundation or association is the plaintiff; the party against whom it seeks relief is the defendant. [read post]