Search for: "Discovery Communications, LLC" Results 601 - 620 of 1,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
All proceedings will take place at the Boone County Fairgrounds Community Building at 1601 Industrial Park Road, Boone, Iowa. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by James Kachmar
Following their completion of the course, Drost and Samson founded Evolation Yoga, LLC, which offered several types of yoga, including “hot yoga” which was similar to Bikram’s basic yoga system. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
By Catherine Schutz The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled that a series of yoga poses is a “sequence” and therefore inappropriate for copyright protection.[1] The ruling was widely praised within the yoga community, with many relieved to finally have clarity on the question of whether yoga can be “owned. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 11:09 am by Gregory W. McClune
Once that startling discovery had been made, it was easy to sweep the principle aside. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 11:04 am by Gregory W. McClune
Once that startling discovery had been made, it was easy to sweep the principle aside. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Dobson, supra.The court then explains how the inadvertent disclosure of the communication occurred:[i]n the course of providing discovery to the government, Gott's trial counsel gave the government three documents, consisting of four pages, which contained statements by Gott that were subject to the attorney-client privilege or were work product. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   See, e.g., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
Taking a problem-solution approach to define what is “new and useful” is precisely the type of analysis that Judge Chen applied in DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  In 2014, for instance, a DOL investigation resulted in Shell Oil Co. and Motiva Enterprises LLC, which markets Shell gasoline and other products, agreeing to pay $4,470,764 in overtime back wages to 2,677 current and former chemical and refinery employees to settle DOL charges that the companies violated FLSA overtime provisions by not paying workers for the time spent at mandatory pre-shift meetings and failing to record the time spent at these meetings. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Kmart of Wash., LLC, 153 Wash.App. 846, 223 P.3d 1247 (Washington Court of Appeals 2009). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Eric Goldman
Thus, another defense option would be to pursue a quick summary judgment, perhaps getting the judge to restrict discovery just to the merits of a Section 230 defense. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
 This is because the trial court is `”better positioned than another”’ to decide discovery issues. [read post]