Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 601 - 620
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 2:40 am
Plaintiff argues that “[a]n overwhelming majority of consumers think of the CRAYOLA mark without prompting when asked to name a brand of crayons. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:46 am
Nestlé USA, Inc., 2022 WL 1062050, -- F. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:41 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:23 am
Mast Biosurgery USA Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 2566426 (11th Cir. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
Virtual Point Inc. dba CrossPath, It Manager, D2012-1157 (WIPO July 24, 2012). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:41 am
Virtual Point Inc. dba CrossPath, It Manager, D2012-1157 (WIPO July 24, 2012). [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm
It detects over 20 distinct emotions in any digital content, which helps organizations measure and understand how people feel about a topic – ranging from companies, brands, and people to concepts. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Digital Access, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:02 am
Mecta Corp., Inc., 152 Cal.App.4th 1094, 1103-1104 (2007)). [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:38 am
As a basic rule, trademark rights hinge on distinctiveness. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:23 am
Flowers Foods Inc. et al. and was filed in federal court in the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 3:04 pm
" Citing Stix Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:41 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:05 pm
The most distinctive sign of the infection is a sustained, high fever - as high as 103-104 degrees. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Hargis Industries Inc. et al. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
Borden Inc., which had previously been confirmed by the Irish Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 am
Borden Inc., which had previously been confirmed by the Irish Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
Borden Inc., which had previously been confirmed by the Irish Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:03 am
The distinction between the law’s treatment of generic terms and its treatment of merely descriptive terms ensures that a generic term cannot be monopolized, even by a business that devotes substantial resources to persuading consumers that a generic term represents its particular brand. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 7:45 am
The distinction between the law’s treatment of generic terms and its treatment of merely descriptive terms ensures that a generic term cannot be monopolized, even by a business that devotes substantial resources to persuading consumers that a generic term represents its particular brand. [read post]
