Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 601 - 620 of 12,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Back in 2012, I filed a petition with the Court in a case raising the very same issue, Herrera v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 11:15 am by Mark Tabakman
When I begin defending a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action, one of the first strategies I look for is to find some way to kick the named plaintiff out of the lawsuit, whether through, perhaps, a Rule 68 Offer of Judgment or a contention that they are not a valid part of the lawsuit and so the whole thing must go away. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:53 pm
  Does it, for example, reach vertically up through the D.O.J. in D.C, into the oval office? [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
  Standing isn't supposed to permit generalized grievances to be pursued in court, and so I see that as a problem if Supreme Court review is sought...but many of the plaintiffs here are states, who get that specialized standing as a result of Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Still working on a long post on Garcia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
I readily believe Qualcomm that they had misinterpreted the law, but does that make the agreements they signed until then involuntary? [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:48 am
When Castaneda told defendant that there was currency in the package, defendant responded that it was not his, that he was not expecting any money, and that there was no reason for anyone to send him money through the mail. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:35 pm by jefhenninger
While there are many ways to defend such a case, the case of U.S. v. [read post]