Search for: "Doe v. Doe, III." Results 601 - 620 of 10,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 8:59 am by Keri S. Bruce
   Although the request for comments asks numerous questions, the FTC has highlighted the following as the ones it is most interested in: (i) Whether there is a continuing need for the Guides; (ii) Whether there have been changes in the case law that should be reflected in the Guides; (iii) How, if at all, the Guides should be revised to account for new developments in commercial practices since 1990 (when the Guides were last reviewed and amended) such as the growth of the… [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Justice Altamas KabirSupreme Court of IndiaIn a judgment that could have far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court in Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:10 am by Kristen Rodriguez
’” The Court emphasized that a plaintiff does not “automatically satisf[y] the injury-in-fact requirement whenever a statute grants a person a statutory right and purports to authorize that person to sue to vindicate that right” and that a plaintiff “cannot satisfy the demands of Article III by alleging a bare procedural violation. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm by Florian Mueller
But again, the name of an exemplary product is unimportant.Last year, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion on a case (TiVo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:54 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 In order to maintain a suit in federal court, a plaintiff must show that the requirements of Article III standing are satisfied. [read post]