Search for: "Doe v. University of Michigan"
Results 601 - 620
of 986
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
Here is the question raised in the Briscoe petition, filed in May of last year by University of Michigan law professor Richard D. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:58 am
Bollinger, the University of Michigan affirmative action case decidedi n 2003. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:31 pm
Black (Michigan State University) and Ryan J. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
Lots of people need help defending against foreclosure in Michigan. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm
Bollinger, upholding the University of Michigan’s use of race in admissions. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:02 am
Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1983). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am
Does Clarence Thomas believe Korematsu v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Bollinger, in which the court upheld the University of Michigan Law School’s consideration of race “as one factor among many, in an effort to assemble a student body that is diverse in ways broader than race. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:26 am
He does not. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The seminal case in this line of cases is Michigan v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am
She does not deserve such attacks but these individuals are the face of rage in our society. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:27 am
However, the award does break new ground in one important regard. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
Second, Section 3 does not to me seem to add any additional registration requirements that would violate the applicable conflict preemption standards (see Hines v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
The importance of the difference in purpose was set out in bold relief just yesterday in Justice Sotomayor's opinion for the Court in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
