Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 601 - 620 of 2,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
In the leading New York case, Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals noted criticism of what it called Aronson‘s “reasonable doubt threshold of Delaware’s two-fold approach to demand futility” and formulated its own three-part standard: (1) Demand is excused because of futility when a complaint alleges with particularity that a majority of the board of directors is interested in the challenged transaction. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:21 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Since none of the details mentioned are present in the description, the description alone does not directly and unambiguously disclose these details to the person skilled in the art.The same is true for Figure 1. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law  253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:41 am by Nate Nead
Historical Transactions In 2017, there were 88 staffing firm transactions announced. [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:09 am
The latest issue of the Nordic Journal of International Law (Vol. 88, no. 1, 2019) is out. [read post]
2 May 2019, 4:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Territorial Tax Systems in the OECD Over the last three decades, most OECD countries have shifted towards territorial tax systems and away from residence-based or “worldwide” systems.[1] The goal of many countries has been to reduce barriers to international capital flows and to increase the competitiveness of domestically headquartered multinational firms. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 9:03 pm by Bill Marler
Of 88 people with information available, 32 (36 percent) have been hospitalized. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
Independent claim 1 of the main request found allowable by the opposition division reads as follows:"1. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
SharkNinja argued that (1) unrefuted evidence showed that, due to its substantial advertising expenses, it lost money on the relevant model during the relevant period and thus had no profits to disgorge, and (2) even if it made a profit, the jury irrationally failed to apportion the profits to award Dyson only the share attributable to false advertising. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Referral of a point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appealby the President of the European Patent Office(Article 112(1)(b) EPC)Under Article 112(1)(b) EPC the President of the European Patent Office refers the following points of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:1. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:26 am by Kevin Kaufman
This should help guide policymakers’ thinking to ensure that tax policy does not stand in the way of a revival in American entrepreneurship. [read post]