Search for: "Does 1-95"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 2:19 am
[1] Regulation 3(1)(a)(ii) [2] Regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) as read together with Regulation 3(3)(a) to (c) [3] Regulation 3(1)(c) [4] Regulation 4(1)(a) [5] Regulation 4(1)(a)(i) [6] Regulation 4(1)(c) [7] Regulation 4(1)(i) [8] Regulation 4(1)(k) [9] Regulation 4(1)(l) [10] Regulation 4(2) [11] Regulation 6(9) [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:09 pm
As an initial matter, it means “does the automatic stay apply? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:59 am
An Appendix to the guidance addresses appropriate measures for higher-risk workplaces, defined as those where vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, including those who are at-risk: (1) work in close contact; (2) are in close contact for a prolonged period of time; (3) are exposed to the virus through respiratory droplets in the air; (4) live in communal housing; (5) share employer-provided transportation; and (6) are in contact with other unvaccinated or otherwise at-risk individuals in… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:59 am
An Appendix to the guidance addresses appropriate measures for higher-risk workplaces, defined as those where vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, including those who are at-risk: (1) work in close contact; (2) are in close contact for a prolonged period of time; (3) are exposed to the virus through respiratory droplets in the air; (4) live in communal housing; (5) share employer-provided transportation; and (6) are in contact with other unvaccinated or otherwise at-risk individuals in… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:59 am
An Appendix to the guidance addresses appropriate measures for higher-risk workplaces, defined as those where vaccinated and unvaccinated persons, including those who are at-risk: (1) work in close contact; (2) are in close contact for a prolonged period of time; (3) are exposed to the virus through respiratory droplets in the air; (4) live in communal housing; (5) share employer-provided transportation; and (6) are in contact with other unvaccinated or otherwise at-risk individuals in… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm
Phillips (1981), 95 Ill. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 7:52 am
The Rule 104(a) standard does not require perfection. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 pm
How does the Chief get around this rule? [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:46 am
Does Bob’s 49% interest create an affiliation with BobCorp? [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
(Decision #1, para.1) Decision #1 described Justice McLeod’s background based on an Agreed Statement of Facts. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:06 am
Comm’r, 95 T.C.M. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:26 am
In this regard, the decision lends support to the reading of Bolagsupplysningen according to which most, if not all injunctions fall into this category (see Stadler, JZ 2018, 94, 95; Lutzi (2018) 34 LQR 208, 212). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 3:55 am
To mitigate the negative economic effects of a global minimum tax, policymakers should ensure that both the minimum rate and the tax base to which it applies are designed in a way that does not distort investment decisions but still acts as a backstop to current corporate tax rules. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:19 am
Scope The EC’s decision document, to which the SCCs are annexed, states that the new SCCs may be used for transfers to a processor or controller based outside the EU “only to the extent that the processing by the importer does not fall within the scope of“ GDPR. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
No. 95-595, at 120. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 2:55 pm
I-40, I-85, and I-95 are among the busiest roads for truckers in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
We are satisfied that it is not sufficient for a tenant to establish that a director of a landlord company has committed an offence under sections 75(1) or 95(1) of the 2004 Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 2:34 am
The FSCA declined the application on the basis that it did not comply with section 95(1)(b) of CISCA. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
For ease of identification throughout the post, I’m listing them here: 1. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm
No. 95-989, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. (1978), reprinted in 3 Collier on Bankruptcy App. 3, at V-94, U.S. [read post]
