Search for: "Does 1-99"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 9:06 am
Does each user need a personal dashboard? [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:55 am
However, a 28 percent federal corporate income tax rate combined with Biden’s proposal to tax long-term capital gains and qualified dividends at an ordinary income tax rate of 39.6 percent for income earned over $1 million would make the top integrated tax rate on corporate income in the U.S. the highest in the OECD at 62.7 percent (see Figure 3).[13] If the Biden tax plan were fully implemented, the U.S. rank on the Tax Foundation’s International Tax Competitiveness Index… [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 1:34 pm
The use of Form 99 filings or renewals ceased on February 1, 2021, but an issuer my still use the Form 99 registration number through the 4 year period, and amended Form 99s will be accepted from these issuers through December 2, 2024, but cease after that date, with the issuer required to file through the EFD system. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:17 am
Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977), noting that the latter provision contains an express limitation that §355(f ) does not, distinguishing Califano from this case. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 11:15 am
The hourly rate back then was $20.00, and judges routinely nicked-down the hours submitted when they thought a task should have been done in, say, .1 hours instead of .2. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 9:43 am
I estimate that an OEM Agreement is needed 99% of the time. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
Here again is our brief supporting the petition for review; I expect that we will refile a version of this brief in the coming weeks, at the merits stage of the case: Introduction This case presents three important related questions: (1) Does Oregon law unconstitutionally deny ordinary Oregonians the protections offered by Gertz v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 6:16 am
However, an exclusive foreign jurisdiction clause does not exclude Australian courts’ jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
But such speakers can usually be fairly confident that their target won't invest the money in getting and enforcing a judgment.[1] [B.] 47 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
San Mateo Sept. 1, 2020), In re Uber Tech. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
It should be added that article 24-4 of the Brussels I Bis Regulation does not apply in the context of a provisional proceeding as long as the court seized does not rule on the validity of the right and it seems valid. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 9:55 am
Two things: (1) if the EOCA charge does not correspond to one of these statutorily listed crimes; or (2) if the evidence does not support these charges and they cannot be proven by the state, then the defense may be able to negotiate down those charges in a plea deal or move for their dismissal in the courtroom. 2. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:55 am
., 117 N.J. 539 (1990), a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court held that (1) there was “no reason to extend the protection of the LAD to sex-discrimination claims based on voluntary personal relations in the workplace” and (2) “favoritism in the workplace, based solely on personal romantic preference as opposed to coercion, does not constitute discrimination on the basis of gender. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 7:33 am
Repealing the worldwide allocation relative to current law would result in a tax hike, but at the same time, allocating U.S. expenses using a worldwide apportionment rule does not make sense if the goal is to have a territorial tax system. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 7:28 pm
How Does the COVID Disaster Enhancement Work? [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:36 am
In an effort to avoid the prohibitive cost of hard copies, the book will be made available first as an EPub (iBook, Kindle, Amazon) (ISBN: 978-1-949943-03-0 (ebk). [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:17 am
It does not appear that this issue was raised at the lower court. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 8:03 am
J. 99, 139 (Judgt. of Feb. 3). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:33 pm
The federal government’s requirements obviously restrict the ability of foreign nationals to enter Canada; however, this does not raise any constitutional issues. [read post]
