Search for: "Duck v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
” An Ohio state court disagreed, ruling last year that Auto-Owners had no duty to defend G & K under the policy. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:53 am by Karen Dyck
(v) Talking on electronic communication devices is not permitted while court is in session. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:12 pm
See Thoughts on United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:07 am by Scott Michelman
Ferguson or Japanese internment camps in Korematsu v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
United States, must come from the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Whether it can do so is a key issue in the current case, Gill v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Justice Quince is asking the right questions   In effect, Justice Quince is asking the same question at the heart of Kelo v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:00 am by Rumpole
For those of you who are casual or non-esq readers of the blog, or for those of you who wear a black robe to work, the landmark case of Gideon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]