Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
The full text of the judgment in the case of Rajesh Solanki v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:12 pm
So, Ontario is ducking the offshore wind issue until after the election. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Although Titlecraft pointed to minor differences in size, angles, and texture, the court stated that “‘if it walks like a duck, quacks like a like and looks like a duck, it has got to be a duck’ – or in this case a copy. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
They would duck and weave when they should prod and plea. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Such intervention is not required, but when OSHA does intervene, the state will not be able to use the Eleventh Amendment to duck compliance with the law. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
I was generally supportive of legislatively overruling Iqbal (and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
You know, Bush v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 9:40 am
Microsoft Corp v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 9:40 am
Microsoft Corp v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
I also welcome the opportunity to state our position on these issues. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:57 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Mar. 23, 2010) (complaint “only asserts a state law, without reference to a federal violation, [and] is preempted”); McQuiston v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:39 pm
In Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm
I wouldn't be at all surprised if the panel ducks the merits altogether and rules only on the basis of standing. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 am
An excellent example of this trend can be found in the Wisconsin case of State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:33 am
The facts in McCoy v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
We posted a pdf file of Cheryl Cheatham's "timeline" of ethics developments and rule-making in Congress. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
