Search for: "EASTERN EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 601 - 620
of 634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:56 pm
United States Dep't of Agric., 415 F.3d 1078, 1093 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n, 273 F.3d at 1236.) [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:53 am
Class Action Alleging Fraud Under RICO in Advertising of Light Cigarettes Fails to Satisfy Prerequisites for Class Action Certification Under Rule 23 because Individual Issues Predominate Second Circuit Holds Judge Jack Weinstein of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York certified a class action against Philip Morris USA, R.J. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office):"Today's ruling enjoining the PTO from implementing its controversial rules on continuations and claims is a sound decision that reflects the concerns we expressed in our amicus brief. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Class 46) Global - Patents Valuing patents: discussion on Malte Kollner’s Intellectual Asset Management Magazine article ‘The journey is the reward’: (IP finance), Indigenous groups express concern on IP protection of their knowledge: (Intellectual Property Watch), Eco-patent commons – what’s going on? [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
According to TrollTracker (click here for TrollTracker’s year end filing analysis), the Eastern District of Texas was first with 364 filings, more than 2.5 times the Northern District’s filings. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
Plaintiffs, twelve Wisconsin franchisees brought an action under the Sherman Act, RICO, the Wisconsin Anti-Trust Act, and other Wisconsin consumer protection laws in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, alleging, inter alia, that Quizno's "fraudulently induced plaintiffs and the Class to purchase franchises and thereafter exploited their control and economic power in order to extract exorbitant and unjustifiable… [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:12 pm
Likewise, the Eastern District of Kentucky stated in Kentucky Speedway, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:28 pm
In The Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:50 am
Raymond v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:15 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted summary judgment in favor of the employee. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:31 am
This issue was recently the focus of pre-trial motions in two cases pending in the Vioxx multidistrict litigation pending in New Orleans, Louisiana, In Re: Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1657, United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
