Search for: "EMPLOYERS DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 601 - 620 of 3,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 7:33 am by Marty Lederman
Many employers with church plans will conclude that their religious obligations are not violated if and when the TPAs provide payments voluntarily, outside the auspices of the church plan, as long as the employers themselves are not required to participate in any way. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by Casey K. Fleming
  For example: Controlled group status determines whether a plan is a single employer or multiple employer plan – a consideration that is especially important in the self-insured welfare plan context. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Employment Liability Claims It is well settled that Section 533 bars indemnification of an insured’s direct liability Section 12940(h) of California’s Government Code, which prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for engaging in protected activity under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For the 2014 and 2015 fee years, Notice 2014-24 will allow such an entity to exclude 50% of its direct premiums written for expatriate plans in reporting total direct premiums written to the IRS for purposes of determining its ACA § 9010 Health Insurance Providers Fee. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:10 am by Kevin LaCroix
If they don’t provide the insurance, the company is liable for a $2,000 penalty on each of its employees. [read post]
However, small and medium-sized companies are also indirectly affected, as the law requires large companies to ensure that their direct suppliers also comply with the requirements and address them along the supply chain. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
They are not really involved, and they just direct workers to their insurance carrier if they have any questions. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, the SRA contains a "Hold Harmless Provision" which provided that "[t]he Employee agrees that the Employer shall have no liability whatsoever for any loss suffered by the Employee with regard to his selection of an insurance company or mutual fund, or the solvency of, operation of, or benefits provided by said insurance company or mutual fund company. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, the SRA contains a "Hold Harmless Provision" which provided that "[t]he Employee agrees that the Employer shall have no liability whatsoever for any loss suffered by the Employee with regard to his selection of an insurance company or mutual fund, or the solvency of, operation of, or benefits provided by said insurance company or mutual fund company. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 1:14 pm by admin
As we will discuss next week, hiring employees entails withholding taxes, paying the employer’s portion of FICA, purchasing worker’s compensation, paying unemployment insurance, complying with wage and hour laws, and the list goes on and on. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:04 am by Greg Mersol
California Labor Code section 2802 provides that "[a]n employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties as such, or of his or her obedience to the directions of the employer. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:30 pm by Donald Dinnie
The Stonegate Pub Company judgment contains a useful review of English law relating to the doctrine of subrogation in contracts of indemnity particularly insurance, which the court said were of direct relevance. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:14 am by James Hoffmann
When you apply for workers compensation, your employer and the insurance company will ask for proof that your condition is a direct result of your work activities. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:40 pm
., 7/2/2018)Over a five-year period, plaintiff's former bookkeeper stole approximately $500,000 from his employer by: (1) making unauthorized purchases with company credit cards; (2) making unauthorized withdrawals from the company's line of credit; and (3) taking company inventory for personal use. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:05 am by Jon Gelman
In the most basic terms, if the employer is directing the worker, including setting his or her schedule, telling the worker what to do, when to do it and how to do it, the worker should be listed as an employee, according to federal rules.By listing workers as independent contractors, companies can avoid paying insurance, taxes and overtime. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:34 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
    The light duty placement companies do several things to insure the success of the temporary duty process. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:17 am
The direct employer was a clear independent contractor severing the statutory employer from any liability. [read post]