Search for: "Ed Kennedy" Results 601 - 620 of 1,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 5:43 am by Mark Walsh
Katyal will explain why he is supporting Gorsuch in a New York Times op-ed that will post shortly after the event. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:53 pm by Molly Runkle
Bender and Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal, as well as Sara Randazzo, who also wrote on Gorsuch’s business opinions; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, who also wrote on Justice Kennedy’s role and Gorsuch’s key decisions; Michael Memoli of the Los Angeles Times, as well as David Savage; Julie Pace and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press; Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed; Shane Goldmacher, Josh Gerstein and Matthew Nussbaum of Politico, as well as Jennifer Haberkorn;… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Washington Times, Ryan Owens argues that Donald Trump should nominate Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court because Gorsuch is well-positioned to “counteract Justice Elena Kagan’s apparent influence on Justice Anthony Kennedy and gently escort Justice Kennedy back to his conservative roots. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Washington Post, Ronald Klain maintains that “to win the real battle for the future of the high court, the nomination and the messaging around it should be aimed at the one man who truly matters: Anthony Kennedy,” and that if “Trump picks one of the two most widely speculated choices — federal appeals court judges William Pryor or Neil Gorsuch — that will likely encourage Kennedy to stay in… [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As President Kennedy said, “A rising tide lifts all boats. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
’ In re Brooks, 324 S.C. 105, 108, 477 S.E.2d 98, 99 (1996) (citing In re Fullwood, 322 S.C. 1, 6, 471 S.E.2d 151, 154 (1996); In re Kennedy, 254 S.C. 463, 465, 176 S.E.2d 125, 126 (1970)). [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Trump: Justice Kennedy. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am by MBettman
On the dissenting side, Justice Kennedy, joined by Justice O’Donnell, dissented both on the procedural issues, finding the case not properly before the court, and disagreeing on the extension of Graham to juvenile offenders sentenced to consecutive, fixed prison terms for multiple nonhomicide offenses. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:08 am by SHG
If there had been anything, even untoward flatulence within smelling distance of a co-ed, he would have been castigated. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am by Ron Coleman
So, to right this wrong, myself, along with Ed McPherson and Tracy Rane of McPherson Rane filed a petition for cert yesterday, asking the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:45 am by David Post
As Randall Kennedy [in Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word] has described, these people “have thrown the slur right back in their oppressors’ faces. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 4:52 am by SHG
He’s written tons of op-eds, spoken at a great many hearings, and that’s it? [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:54 am by Terry Hart
Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, December 2, 1964. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” In New York Magazine, Ed Kilgore wrote in June, 2016: Kennedy’s power as the king of a divided Court was aptly summarized by conservative writer John Podhoretz, who tweeted: “Everybody’s upset about Brexit, but basically the United States is now being governed by one 80 year old man. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Kennedy holding the deciding vote in the court’s biggest cases. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]