Search for: "Edwards v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, only thirty-nine percent of those surveyed could explain that the Senate is assigned the role of advising and consenting to new Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am by Robert Kraft
Today is, of course, Veterans Day in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:52 am by Bob Kraft
Today is, of course, Veterans Day in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:41 am by Robert Kraft
Today is, of course, Veterans Day in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on circuits courts' power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte)No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 8:51 am by cindy
It’s been a long, slow road, but the NSA has been forced to reduce its mass spying in the United States in major ways. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm by Rich
Time to stand aside and let the lead singer have the stage:This court devoutly wishes that the Supreme Court of the United States had not blindly stumbled off on the wrong foot and in the wrong direction when it handed down Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:04 am by corynne
In an order granting Google's request for a preliminary injunction, Judge Edward Davila held that Section 230 protected Google's activities in indexing the website at issue, and that the Canadian order was therefore unenforceable in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that the federal bank robbery statute’s “forced accompaniment” provision applies whenever a bank robber forces someone to go somewhere with him, even for a short distance. [read post]