Search for: "Empire v. Commercial" Results 601 - 620 of 757
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest:  Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
But subject to those important limitations, the available empirical evidence suggests that procedural reasons tend to be more important (for many, although not all, types of contracts) than substantive reasons in explaining why parties agree to arbitrate. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am by RT
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Such claims would qualify as unprotected commercial speech and are therefore not protected under the Central Hudson analysis. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
. 'Nerd' fails to gain an entry, notwithstanding the consideration of this word by Lords Justices Jacob and Pill in the patent appeal of Rockwater v Technip (here). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
An empirically descriptive theory about rules, laws, norms, and the operations of power within countersites. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm by Eric
The court’s presumption here, an empirical question that the court doesn’t defend, is off-base. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Recording has shorter commercial life. [read post]