Search for: "English v. English"
Results 601 - 620
of 11,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 1:57 pm
Could this volume be from the library of the great English common lawyer, Sir Edward Coke? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:32 am
No English or even Anglophone judges or lawyers [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 4:15 pm
Gowns is an English company [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:08 am
Before the court in the case of Tickle v Council of the Borough of North Tyneside and others ([2015] EWHC 2991 (Fam)) were cross applications by a journalist and the local authority regarding care proceedings which the former wished to report. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:17 am
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission in Plain English. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:23 pm
Another judgment, another instance of the English court seizing jurisdiction in a patent dispute. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:37 am
It was clear that he did not speak English. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 8:11 am
This was the first time in the English jurisdiction that an expert had been found to owe a fiduciary duty to its client. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
The earlier case, Galxo v Genentech [2008] EWCA Civ 23, was generally regarded as discouraging of stays, but the dicta was later questioned by the Supreme Court in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] UKSC 46. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:47 am
The overheated English summer saw no sign. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
In the case of V v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWCOP 21) the Court of Protection ruled that where a court has restricted the publication of information during proceedings that were in existence during a person’s lifetime, it has not only the right but the duty to consider, when requested to do so, whether that information should continue to be protected following the person’s death. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
Let’s talk about the decision in McCullen v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
There is a threshold requirement: in order to be actionable, an interference must attain a certain level of seriousness (McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73[12], Ambrosiadou v Coward [2011] EMLR 21 [28]–[30]). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
Victoria Barnes, and Emily Whewell, Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, have posted English Contract Law Moves East: Legal Transplants and the Doctrine of Misrepresentation in British Consular Courts, which appears in the Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 7 (2019): 26-48:This article analyses the legal conception of misrepresentation in the well-noted case of Von Gumpach v Hart (1870). [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:46 am
The Court of Appeals affirms and plaintiff loses the case for good.The case is Frilando v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:05 pm
v=IXfaxEaPOjw)). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
Last year, in a case called McCutcheon v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 6:39 pm
Macera v Village Board of Ilion, 2019 WL 4805354 (NDNY 9/30/2019) [read post]
