Search for: "Ex Parte Land" Results 601 - 620 of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Madiha Afzal
The dissenting judge has also pointed out that “suspension and holding in abeyance” was added to article 6 as an amendment in 2010, more than two years after the state of emergency was imposed in 2007 (though subversion was part of article 6 originally). [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Rich Vetstein
If there is a clear danger that the other party will convey or encumber the subject property, you can file the motion “ex parte” – that is, without the other side being notified in advance, however, do you do have to make that factual showing there is an emergency. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 LA ex rel Caldwell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:30 am by Michael Kazin
Army, a step that, under the name of “preparedness,” was advocated by some of the richest and most powerful men in the landex-president Theodore Roosevelt foremost among them. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Century LLC (EDTexweblog.com)   US Trade Marks – Decisions What a Betty Boop boo – part 3, the adventure continues… 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issues amended opinion in Fleischer Studios, Inc v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was later convicted of the murder of his ex-wife. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
The criteria for “wetlands” in the amendment is less stringent, and thus, more land will be subject to regulation. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Queens Family Lawyer said that, in this proceeding, petitioner commenced a summary proceeding against his ex-domestic partner, respondent, and a certain person. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 12:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Suffolk County Family Lawyer said that, in this proceeding, petitioner commenced a summary proceeding against his ex-domestic partner, respondent, and a certain person. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
§ 2254, which in turn relied on Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114 (1944). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is a brief excerpt: The law of our land came to life on a continent awash with speech and through a process that teemed with talk of the freest sort. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am by Kelly Buchanan
Ex Parte McNiel, 80 U.S. 13 Wall. 236 (1871): the Court considered Roman law concerning the issue of pilotage. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:09 pm by Paul Levy
  To justify ex parte hearing, its lawyer certified (see page 32 of document linked above) that he had no idea what lawyers would be representing Public Citizen so that it could be represented at a hearing (In fact, I had written to the lawyer who signed the certification, two weeks before he signed it, promising a response to his libel demand letter after the main author of our letters to the FDA got back from vacation.) [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman
Generally, litigants are not allowed to engage in ex parte communications with judges. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
For reasons explained in Part I.B of my amicus brief, that simply isn't true. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 2:51 am by SOIssues
Many of them were charged with less serious crimes that wouldn't land them on the registry. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 9:45 am
So yes, it's punishment.Supporters of the bill argue that the registration requirement is a civil penalty, not a criminal action.- But increasing this time on the registry violates ex post facto laws of the Constitution, so it's unconstitutional.Common Pleas Judge Joan Synenberg granted an injunction last week preventing the new law from taking effect against a 26-year-old Bay Village man.- Why not all offenders in the state? [read post]