Search for: "Ex Parte State" Results 601 - 620 of 12,229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
§103(a) (“protection for a work employing preexisting material in which copyright subsists does not extend to any part of the work in which such material has been used unlawfully. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
Strine, Jr., the Delaware Chancery Court held that forum selection provisions adopted by Chevron and Fed Ex, were statutorily and contractually valid, as discussed here. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 8:13 pm by Mark Ashton
Their child plays on the team or is part of the “pack. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
  The lawsuit resolved by this settlement is captioned United States of America, et al., ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
As part of the operation, participants used large campaign donations and cover stories to gain access to their targets and gather dirt to sabotage the reputations of people and organizations considered threats to the agenda of former President Trump. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:12 am
On to the John Birch Society.Hofstadter (as also Daniel Bell) was at this time primarily concerned with the conspiratorial fantasies of the right -- Ike as a tool of the Reds etc. -- and certain of their characteristics, such as the redemptive role of ex-communists in exposing the conspiracies (similar to that of the ex-Catholic priests of yore). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:10 am
Deciding who keeps what is often one of the hardest parts of a divorce. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Otto that it was not misconduct connected with the employee's work to violate a company rule forbidding all contact between current employees and ex-employees. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Many other courts have done much the same, both in state[18] and in federal courts,[19] and both before and after the Supreme Court decided Daubert, and even after Rule 702 was amended in 2000.[20] Perhaps even more disturbing is that the current edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence glibly cites to the Wells case, for the dubious proposition that “Generally, researchers are conservative when it comes to assessing causal relationships, often calling for stronger… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm by Eric Goldman
Unfortunately, because those cases are largely handled ex parte, the judges aren’t raising this concern on their own and defendants aren’t around to raise it either. [read post]