Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 601 - 620
of 15,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2016, 12:16 pm
I gotta be honest with you: When I first started reading this opinion this morning, I was super reluctant.Are we really going to affirm a seven-figure default judgment in federal court when there was a fight about whether service was proper -- wholly apart from the subject matter jurisdiction problems -- and the defendant contacted the plaintiff the very same day the default was obtained and offered to respond to the complaint (and waive its objections to service) if it could have 60… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:24 am
But she forgot to dismiss the lawsuit (as agreed), and eventually figured that out and dismissed it.That's definitely a technical mistake, since the first notice of appeal was premature and after dismissal, she didn't file a second one. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 5:40 pm
The trial court agrees and gives 'em a six-figure fee award.The Court of Appeal rightly reverses. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:52 am
We don't call jurors back to figure out what they "would have" done had circumstances been different, or why they reached the conclusion they did.We don't do it in malpractice cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 12:37 pm
If only to figure out what the heck that organization does.Here, it's a constitutional challenge to California's law against prostitution. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
"You don't need to read the remainder of the opinion to figure out where this is going.Unless, of course, you'd like to see the attorney for Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:09 am
For that, you have to read all the way to page four of the opinion.But from the mere framing of the question -- as well as the strategically placed emphasis on the word "both" -- you can probably already figure out the answer.As page four says:"We hold a section 170.6 challenge filed in a case that is related to (not consolidated with) an earlier-filed case in which the assigned judge has resolved a disputed factual issue relating to the merits requires transfer of only… [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 1:46 pm
We can figure out pretty clearly what's being prohibited here. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:20 pm
But I am surprised that it would take 'em eight months to figure out that you can't just cite people when they're engaging in speech you don't like.But fear not. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 12:48 pm
"You can probably figure out if the Court of Appeal reverses or affirms based on that opening sentence alone. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
I'm persuaded that Alfonso Morales committed (or played a substantial role in committing) the horrific murders at issue in this case, for which he's sentenced to death.Though for the life of me I can't figure out why Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
When you're figuring out the guidelines, the Eleventh Circuit said you can't do that. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Graiser v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Gross v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:53 pm
Novozymes A/S v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 5:05 pm
By Eric Goldman New Mexico v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Go figure. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
Should I just wait for the IRS to figure it out and send me a bill? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
“It doesn't take Hamlet to figure out that something rotten happened in this case. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:06 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
