Search for: "Fine v. Fine"
Results 601 - 620
of 14,378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
Summa Holdings v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:30 am
Sung Woo Hu (J.D. 2014, Minnesota), Note, Fine-Tuning the Tax Whistleblower Statute: Why Qui-tam Is Not a Solution, 99 Minn. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 11:15 am
The ruling in Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 11:15 am
The ruling in Thomson Reuters v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm
I'm fine with that. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:02 am
The Supreme Court held today, 9-0, that administrative compliance orders levied by EPA under the Clean Water Act were subject to judicial review, as they are supported by fines and represent, bascially, the agency's final word on the subject. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
Who've decided to use eminent domain to take the water assets of Golden State and to pay for it with Mello-Roos bonds.The Court of Appeal is fine with that. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 10:45 am
Hansen Almanor Lakeside Villas Owners Assn. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 1:45 pm
That decision fined several Italian enterprises for breaches of Article 65 ECSC. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 3:49 pm
" The case is DirecTV v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 11:38 am
I felt completely fine when classes started on Monday, and I was excited about the next set of classes, but by Wednesday it was clear that I managed to pick up a rather nasty flu of some kind. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 12:16 pm
Judge VanDyke is unhappy with some dicta contained in a particular panel's habeas opinion, so he writes this dissent from the refusal to hear the case en banc.Okay, fine. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 1:15 pm
It's not like the recipient would read the rest of it and then say "Oh, well, at least it ended on a good note; everything's fine, then. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:30 am
Here's a case where a Ninth Circuit panel whose prior opinion was summarily reversed by the Supreme Court says it'd be just fine were the Court to do so again.I was actually thinking last week about what a generally frivolous waste it is for litigants to file rehearing petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:01 am
David Waller, my partner at Baker Hostetler and hospitality lawyer extraordinaire, posted an entry in the firm’s Hospitality Lawg yesterday entitled AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:13 am
The Supreme Court today took up a case of the application of the Apprendi rule (jury trial of facts that increase maximum sentence) to fines in the case of Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:43 am
<> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 7:38 am
Here is the order in Cayuga Nation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
The proposed $4 million penalty includes a $3 million criminal fine and $1 million in organizational community service payments that will fund various marine environmental projects. [read post]
