Search for: "Fischer v. Fischer"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 8:01 am
" Seems like a no-brainer, but unfortunately in 2004, when the court was the most consumer unfriendly, anti-environment, anti-victim, precedent-disregarding court in the land, it ruled in the Kreiner v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:26 pm
Fischer-Lescano & L. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Fischer. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 7:59 am
Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court Allows Extension for Mail-In Ballots in Pennsylvania (Jess Bravin & Brent Kendall, The Wall Street Journal) In a 4–4 Split, the Supreme Court Lets Pennsylvania Make Voting Easier — for Now (Richard Hasen, Slate) We’re Living in the Shadows of a Bush v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
In Kreiner v Fischer, the state's highest court handed down a decision that has acted as a shield for negligent and drunk drivers, permitting them to cause serious injuries to innocent victims, with absolutely no consequence to the perpetrator nor remuneration to the victim. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger; 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
Lee v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger). [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
Fischer, is where the development of the common-law duty of good faith and fair dealing in Texas began. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
Clark Fischer for the Defendant. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Frank v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Fischer, 555 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
”) Bowman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am
Turner v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:47 pm
Justice Scalia would be proud.United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:09 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada today drew a starkly defined line between the power of the courts and the mandate of regulators when it comes to restitution in a potential securities class action.In AIC Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
