Search for: "GARNER v. STATE" Results 601 - 620 of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 2:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., and People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
HB 25 garnered little debate or controversy and will allow the State Engineer to consider nonuse when acting on change applications. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:26 am
" The bill has now garnered support from many organizations including: AARP Center for Justice & Democracy Consumer Federation of America Consumers Union Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings National Association of Consumer Advocates National Consumers League OWL - The Voice of Midlife and Older Women Progressive States Network Public Citizen U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Supreme Court held in Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, when a public employee is compelled to answer questions or face removal if he or she refuses to do so, the responses are cloaked with immunity automatically, and neither the compelled statements nor their fruits may be used against the employee in a subsequent criminal prosecution.Other decisions addressing the issue of requiring an individual to answer "job-related" question include Garner v Broderick, 392 US… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:22 pm
The Court's reasoning: In its decision Tuesday, the appeals court cited Lawrence and Garner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
What’s more, the report highlighted what it termed the CCRC’s “dysfunctional” relationship” with the Ministry of Justice (quoting the High Court in R (Warner) v SoS for Justice [2020]). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This type of counsel is known in California as Cumis counsel, by reference to the 1984 California intermediate appellate case of San Diego Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:54 am by Randall Hodgkinson
As some of you may remember, last fall, the KSC decided State v. [read post]