Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 601 - 620 of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2013, 4:11 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Henry V has three scenes that are saturated with legalism in warfare, both jus ad bellum and jus in bello. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:25 am by Florian Mueller
Various smartphone-related patent and design rights cases have previously been adjudged by appeals courts, but with the exception of two Apple v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
There are now three decisions in favour of eBay (UK, France and Belgium), one decision in favour of L'Oreal (Germany) and one decision (from Spain) still outstanding. [read post]
17 May 2009, 9:03 pm
May 18-21, 2009 - BIO International Convention (Biotechnology Industry Organization) - Atlanta, GA May 20, 2009 - Tafas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:56 pm
UPDATE: News.com.au reports that StudiVZ has filed a complaint in Germany requesting a declaration of non-infringement. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by Allard Knook
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to achieve… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Only the courts of Germany had jurisdiction to vacate the award. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:53 pm by Ray Dowd
The whereabouts of various paintings is unclear today, but a good hundred of them, estimates the Marburg lawyer Stötzel, ended up in museums in America and Germany. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:10 am by INFORRM
Mr Murray relied on the constitutional right to privacy analysed in the case of Herrity v Associated Newspapers ([2009] 1 IR 316) ([28]-[29]) and on the right to privacy protected by Article 8, in particularly on the analysis in Von Hannover v Germany ((2005) 40 EHRR 1)([30] – [35]). [read post]