Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 601 - 620 of 8,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 7:52 pm by M. Scott Koller
  As recently as 2008, California 4th District Court of Appeals addressed this specific issue in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:46 pm by Scott Koller
  As recently as 2008, California 4th District Court of Appeals addressed this specific issue in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Suppose the California Supreme Court (the ultimate interpreter of State law) were to rule that search and seizure protections under the California Constitution do not extend to automobiles. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:17 am
But -- perhaps in part for that reason -- the state of the law here is profoundly muddled. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
  The brief argues that “The uncertain threat of litigation in United States courts, especially for conduct with no significant connection to the United States, could therefore discourage foreign commercial enterprises from establishing channels for their distribution of goods and services in the United States, or otherwise making investments in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
As it stands today, however, California businesses that are open to the public are still obligated to offer their goods and services in a non-discriminatory manner that comp [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Christopher Danzig
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Arthur Nakazato, Benchslap of the Day, Benchslaps, Biglaw, California, CareFusion 303 Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
The Northern District of California's own Judge Illston so held in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Ronald Mann
  Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
In a state that classifies clams, crabs and bumblebees as "fish", the ruling in BioCorRx, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:31 am by Cara Horowitz
Dan already has a good post up on the basics of the Supreme Court’s ruling today in the climate case West Virginia v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
Nevertheless, relying on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]