Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 601 - 620 of 3,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
  Section 55 is brought into effect when a government department, or any person authorised in writing by a government department, infringes a patent without the proprietor’s consent for the purposes of services of the Crown. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:14 am by John Floyd
The Fifth Circuit explained why the district court was correct:   “In Pierre v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
ReWalk Robotics Ltd., 973 F.3d 22, 32-33 (1st Cir. 2020) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss because the basis for the opinion statement was disclosed and there were no contrary, non-disclosed facts); Shreiber v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:28 am by John Jascob
The DOJ generally takes the position that the Second Circuit was correct in upholding class certification in this matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Suppiah v Kalish, 76 AD3d 829, 832 [1st Dept 2010] [reversing grant of summary judgment on malpractice claim].) [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
“We review a decision granting a motion to dismiss for correctness, granting no deference to the decision of the district court. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:14 pm by Larry
That is the main take away from SGS Sports, Inc. v. [read post]