Search for: "Graves v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 2,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm by INFORRM
Specific reference was made to the aggression against Ukraine and the fact that Russia sought to justify and support that aggression by engaging ‘in continuous and concerted propaganda actions targeted at civil society in the Union and neighboring countries, gravely distorting and manipulating facts’. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm by Robert Wagner
As can be seen from the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Magsil Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:20 am by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Some laws are just too confusing to be broken, or so sayeth the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
   In his report the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, presents guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms, which set out the human rights principles and standards that apply to States, international financial institutions and creditors when designing, formulating or… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Last week, the Swaziland High Court handed down a decision with grave implications for freedom of expression. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
” [55] In Blake v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against Justice Nicklin’s meaning judgment for five out of six tweets. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
Oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States was held in Florence v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
Because so much is at stake in the case of District Attorney's Office v. [read post]