Search for: "Graves v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by David M. Driesen
Since the United States is a democratic country, one might say that the nation remains secure as long as threats to the People’s sovereignty over the United States remain at bay. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
That provision empowers the president to deny entry to foreign nationals when entry would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:30 am by Matt Danzer
In addition, disclosure of threat information might reveal human resources for the United States, compromise those sources, and put their or their families’ lives in danger. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Hague cases: A federal district court abused its discretion by deferring to a state court when asked to identify the habitual residence of the children and whether they had been wrongfully removed to the United States from Israel. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by NCC Staff
United States, and decided that Gordon Hirabayashi, a college student, was guilty of violating a curfew order. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Doing so would let the state close, conservatively, 12 to 20 of its 112 prison units over the same period, saving hundreds of millions of dollars per year. [read post]
United States, where former President Trump was granted immunity during and after his presidential terms for all crimes that were committed as “official acts” while in office. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am by Kevin Johnson
” A lawful immigrant from the Philippines, James Garcia Dimaya has lived in the United States since 1992. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
In fact, I can state the unequivocal belief that that day would absolutely never come. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
And the Constitution of the United States affirmatively protects it.There it is, on pages 25-26 of the slip opinion: "Respondents have not shown that requiring doctors to intend dismemberment before delivery to an anatomical landmark will prohibit the vast majority of D&E abortions. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Joshua Sellers
This background helps explain the widespread condemnation that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Brnovich v. [read post]