Search for: "Gray v. District Court" Results 601 - 620 of 965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court E D California: Court finds logo either protected as parody or not likely to cause confusion: Protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case decision was handed down on March 24, 2010, by the Federal District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, by Judge Gray H. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Connecticut 2007) - in which one of the jurors sent the prosecutor an email c [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(1709 Blog) (Michael Geist) Netherlands District Court of The Hague rules no infringement: Vacu Products v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
Hy-Grade Valve Inc (Gray on Claims) (Maier & Maier) (Docket Report) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Court’s ‘Greater familiarity with the law of false marking due to the hundreds of cases filed’ does not weigh against transfer of venue: Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
 (Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
Section 29 is specific and has been interpreted by the Court of Appeal in Callery v Gray. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
CAS Medical Systems, Inc (Docket Report) District Court M D Pennsylvania: Conflicting claim constructions preclude finding of wilfulness: Arlington Industries v. [read post]