Search for: "Gregory Favors" Results 601 - 620 of 1,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
 Noting the uncertainty regarding the scope of that prong in consumer cases, the Court followed Gregory v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
Horowitz’s comments are generally favorable, however he takes issue with a few parts of the ATTP. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by WSLL
Morgan, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Gregory A. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
Gregory said that that since the bill would pose no cost to taxpayers, and is supported by the industry and a broad range of interests, "it should be a straightforward, logical choice for Congress vote in favor of it. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:56 pm
According to recent news, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Gregory Alacron ruled last week in favor of the "Gossip Girl" star, after the television actress sued her mother in July of last year, claiming that she misspent the money the Leighton sent on a monthly basis in order to provide for her little brother's health treatments. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:02 am by WSLL
Quinn.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff):  Gregory A. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Gregory Dell
In addition, the Social Security Administration issued a fully favorable decision on Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:32 pm by Gregory Dell
After Plaintiff received a Social Security Administration decision in his favor, Plaintiff again requested that Defendants reinstate his long term disability benefits on April 25, 2011. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:46 am by Gregory Dell
And, while the Court did deny the insurer’s motion, that doesn’t mean that Karen N. will receive a favorable outcome in her lawsuit to receive her disability benefits. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:02 pm by Daniel Richardson
  The trial court again found in favor of Plaintiff, and Dealer appealed.On appeal, Dealer asked the SCOV to consider several defenses: whether Dealer’s purported lack of knowledge about these defects relieved it from Plaintiff’s consumer fraud claim, and whether the trial court erred in not considering evidence that Plaintiff bought the vehicle “as is. [read post]