Search for: "Harper v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1939 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am
Stephen Pitel, Jesse Harper, Choice of Law for Tort in Canada: Reasons for Change In 1994 the Supreme Court of Canada in Tolofson v Jensen adopted a new and controversial choice of law rule for tort claims. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
He stated that "You don't need to fix the patent system - it's not broken. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Agent G states in the Criminal Complaint that he reviewed a letter sent to A at her home, postmarked 20 October 2008, which stated in part: “I remember our past experiences together so fondly. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:19 am
See Washington v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am
Static Control Components and United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
A former Harper’s Bazaar intern filed suit, claiming that she regularly worked more than 40 hours per week at the magazine, and sometimes as many as 55 hours per week, without compensation. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/UY7DquwRV2 -> Recap of Washington State’s Employer Social Media Password Bill http://t.co/eeHWKyhy4n -> Has the UK abolished copyright? [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Although RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments in the 1997 case of City of Boerne v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:40 pm
For example, in Harper & Row Publishers v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
As a matter of EU law, the CJEU in SABAM v Scarlet has stated that intellectual property rights are neither inviolable nor must be absolutely protected, but must be balanced against other fundamental rights including freedom of expression. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:39 am
For the first factor, the district court quote Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:39 am
For the first factor, the district court quote Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:39 am
For the first factor, the district court quote Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
