Search for: "Holder v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 7,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2009, 10:11 pm
Holder largely dodged the core constitutional issue in question and has forced me to wonder how the Court will handle a different, though similarly charged, issue in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am by John Enser
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation required… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:01 am by Rebecca Jeschke
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that copyright holders like Universal must consider fair use before trying to remove content from the Internet. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm by Florian Mueller
While only the actual pursuit of a foreign antisuit injunction against a SEP holder is--under the Munich appeals court's Nokia v. [read post]