Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 601 - 620 of 4,263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
  Regardless of whether you are dealing with Federal or State laws, the United States and the Insurance Carriers are entitled to receive recovery based on the applicable law. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
On January 1, 2021, the United States Senate joined the House of Representatives in overriding President Trump’s veto, and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) became law. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm by Shannon O'Hare
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On 20 December 2020 Congress approved the “second-largest economic relief package in US history” of USD 900bn (the first tracking back to the beginning of the pandemic in March, securing USD 2.2tn). [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Daniel Nathan
An investment contract was defined by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:26 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Fostoria Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:29 am by SHG
Just look at Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am by Amy Howe
They filed the lawsuit that led to Thursday’s decision after they were placed on the “no fly” list, which barred them from boarding commercial flights in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am by Florian Mueller
In fact, Apple and Intel are suing Softbank-owned Fortress Investment in the Northern District of California, and one Fortress front named Uniloc has made such procedural moves in the United States. [read post]