Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD" Results 601 - 620 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND CANADA TRAITE D’EXTRADITION ENTRE LES ETATS-UNIS D’AMERIQUE ET LE CANADA TEXT: BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition between the United States of America and Canada was signed at Washington on December 3, 1971, as amended by an exchange of notes on June 28 and July 9, 1974, the original of which Treaty, as amended, is hereto annexed; The Senate of the… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:40 pm by Fiona de Londras
In addition, the report notes the extent to which child sexual abuse remains a concern in Ireland with a high volume of all calls to Child Line, for example, relating to matters of sexual abuse of children. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
[if he or she p]erforms an abortion knowing that the abortion is sought based on the sex or race of the child or the race of a parent of that child....B. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:32 am
I can tell you a few interesting stories. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) (plurality opinion), which we have implemented in In re Adoption of C.A.,137 P.3d 318 (Colo. 2006), and in In re B.J., 242 P.3d 1128 (Colo. 2010)....Just as the fit parents’ decision to consent to a guardianship is presumed to be in the best interests of the child, so too their decision to seek termination of the guardianship and regain care, custody, and control of the child is presumed to be in the best… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:24 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
“[A]s in custody disputes, quarrels concerning a child’s surname should be decided according to the best interests of the child. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:57 pm by Jeralyn
He pays $110,000 a month in child support. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:44 pm by Isabel McArdle
One landmark case which helped establish the possibility of public interest challenges to administrative decisions was R v Inspectorate of Pullution Ex p Greenpeace Ltd (No 2), R v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries  and Food Ex p Greenpeace Ltd [1994] 4 All ER 329. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
Stacey Velasquez and Sargosa Alaniz, individually and as next friends of their minor child, Saragosa Mario Alaniz, No. 07? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that… [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 1:21 am by Marta Requejo
The duration of that reasonable period must take into account the best interests of the child in the specific circumstances of the proceedings concerned. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
(b)        In all Indian child custody proceedings, as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, the court shall consider all of the findings contained in subdivision (a), strive to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families, comply with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, and seek to protect the best interest of the child. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  It was not to dictate that an illegitimate infant who has never been a member of an Indian home or culture, and probably never would be, should be removed from its primary cultural heritage and placed in an Indian environment over the express objections of its non-Indian mother…Numerous provisions of the Act support our conclusion that it was never the intent of Congress that the Act would apply to a factual situation as is before the court.[21]       Missouri… [read post]