Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE A GRAND JURY."
Results 601 - 620
of 1,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 3:01 pm
The Court determines that its discretion is properly employed here to enter a writ of prohibition upon the petition, barring respondents from re-presenting to a grand jury the matters underlying Nassau County indictment number 313N-10, as previously dismissed by order of the Nassau County Court dated October 22, 2010. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Before turning to our little read-out, one comment about the morning’s debate before Judge Janice Rogers Brown and Senior Judges Stephen Williams and David Sentelle: Larry Klayman’s gassy style was…distracting. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
A judge or grand jury may also have to decide whether there is probable cause to issue charges. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:12 pm
In the ordinary case, it is the defendant who, through the exercise of his own right to testify and have others called to testify on his behalf before the Grand Jury ... brings exculpatory evidence to the attention of the Grand Jury. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:04 pm
The District Attorney is required to instruct the Grand Jury on the law with respect to the matters before it. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
Sometimes, counsel who is not present at arraignment is assigned thereafter, but never meets with the defendant before the grand jury votes an indictment. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:46 pm
However, the Matter of Second Additional Grand Jury of County of Kings, is dispositive of that issue. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 12:14 pm
We further find that the prosecutor's instruction on conspiracy in the fourth degree was not so misleading or incomplete that it impaired the integrity of the Grand Jury proceeding. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
Thus, Peter writes, my view of Article III “would compromise Congress’s war powers, while offering little additional protection to the jury trial and grand jury rights that [I] rightly revere[]. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm
However, the first time the Court of Appeals had the question before it, it affirmed, without opinion, the lower court's exercise of discretion in granting the disclosure of grand jury minutes to residents of the Town of Mt. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 9:10 am
The KSC concluded that targets of grand jury proceedings are entitled to due process and that introduction of extraneous matters violates due process:[O]ur statutes contemplate that due process mandates that a Kansas grand jury should only issue an indictment based on legal evidence, rather than suspicion or conjecture.As a result, the KSC agreed that dismissal of the indictment was an appropriate disposition in this case. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 4:56 pm
Question relating to the rights of an accused in criminal proceedings are best addressed and raised by a legal expert. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:58 pm
On September 4, 1984, a Nassau County Grand Jury returned an indictment charging the defendant with two counts of robbery in the first degree. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
The court orders that defendant is held for the Grand Jury. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:03 pm
Five years later, an indictment alleging two counts of forgery in the second degree and one count of petit larceny, was handed down by the County Grand Jury. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:46 am
The Appellate Division then explained that theissue before the Law Division was whether the State needed an expert to explain that document trail to the jury. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 4:59 pm
No state constitutional language or case law requires that matters preliminary to a potential felony indictment be conducted or processed only after a grand jury proceeding. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:31 pm
Although Y did not ultimately testify before a federal grand jury, he took part in approximately four debriefings with federal prosecutors and investigators in the Southern District during the latter part of February and March 1993. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:46 pm
At the time the matter was resubmitted, no action was pending against defendant in a local criminal court, or in any court, and thus the prosecution was under no statutory duty to inform defendant that a second grand jury presentation against him would be made. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:26 am
Accordingly, it is imperative that any party that is currently restrained to make sure that any and all orders have been revoked before any contact or communication is made with the other party. [read post]
