Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 601 - 620
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
This article was originally posted on Inforrm. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
(discussed here on Inforrm). [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:30 pm
. ● Writing for Inforrm’s Blog, Eliza Bechtold in “Free speech in America: is the US approach fit for purpose in the age of social media? [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:22 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
Inforrm’s Blog was of the opinion that the announcement was, amongst other things, a success for the media campaign against the current regime of defamation and privacy conditional fee agreements (CFAs). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:45 am
Former News International lawyer Andrew Chadwick and Hugh Tomlinson of Matrix Chambers and the Inforrm media law blog have been proposing Media Regulation Tribunals: This radical new proposal would roll in libel reform with reform of self-regulation to develop a pan-media tribunals system that would hear complaints relating to journalism, including PCC code issues, as well as defamation and privacy breaches, arguably relatively cheaply and quickly and with specialist expertise. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
For those who want an insight into this new law on the right to privacy, Hugh Tomlinson QC’s three posts which we have reposted from Inforrm’s Blog provide a great outline, an interesting historical background to the law as it stands and a discussion of options for the future. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of The Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, OUP, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
This post first appeared on Inforrm’s blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks Filed under: Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Case summaries, Freedom of Information, Inquests and Inquiries, Media Tagged: associated newspapers [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm
Indeed, the UN Report accepts that in some scenarios internet access will need to be restricted, for example in the case of sex offenders and terrorist suspects – which is also the conclusion of this excellent 2011 post on Inforrm’s blog. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:07 am
Press Regulation Reports this week included: Inforrm reposted Amber Melville-Browns piece from Legal Cheek: Who wants to be a regulator? [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:03 pm
The ex-wife sued upon becoming aware of the breach (Note: the Inforrm case comment here). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:59 am
As Inforrm’s privacy injunction table shows, “blackmail” is cited by judges in a number of recent civil cases; a separate complaint to the police may also be made by the claimant. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:01 am
In short, the case is the latest in the long-running News of the World phone hacking affair (see this post and this one on Inforrm’s Blog for the latest developments). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:32 am
As noted on Inforrm, on 21 March 2018, the UK Supreme Court gave permission to appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:22 am
For further details on revenge porn generally and legislation enacted by other countries, please see previous Inforrm posts here and here. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
