Search for: "In Interest of CT"
Results 601 - 620
of 8,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
Ct. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:11 pm
Ct. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:21 am
The court held that a passive website and e-mails that allegedly caused harm to business interests outside the jurisdiction were not sufficient grounds upon which to exercise personal jurisdiction.The full opinion is available in PDF. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
Ct. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
Velly interesting! [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
Here's an interesting way to write an opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
It's interesting how all the various rights line up here. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:02 pm
For example, is it somewhat interesting that the 32nd District Agricultural Association isn't required to obtain competitive bids to run the Orange County Fair? [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
Ct. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Ct. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 4:20 am
Ct., Aug. 18, 2011), an Illinois trial court rejected attempts by Catholic Charities organizations in three cities to prevent the state of Illinois from refusing to renew their contracts to provide foster care and adoption services for the state. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
Fiji Jamaat-Ul Islam of America, (CA Ct. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:34 am
Ct. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:34 pm
If you're interested, the link is here. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:10 am
High Ct., Dec. 9, 2008), the court ruled in the case in which the plaintiff church objected to a front-page headline in the paper reading: "State bans Satanic sect" along with a picture of its church building. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:30 am
Thus, in cases in which the interested parties have agreed to reform wills or trusts in order to achieve settlements, courts repeatedly have approved of the reformations to which the parties have stipulated (Matter of Schmitt, NYLJ, July 3, 2000, at 1 [Sur Ct, Westchester County]; Matter of Schwartz, NYLJ, Jan. 22, 1992, at 25 [Sur Ct, Westchester County]; Matter of Wilkie, NYLJ, Jan. 17, 1992, at 35 [Sur Ct, Westchester County]). [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:13 pm
The burden to rebut the presumption that they acted in the best interests of the corporations is on the plaintiffs.2. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am
This rule protects attorneys from legal malpractice suits by indeterminate classes of plaintiffs whose interests may be at odds with the interests of the acknowledged client (Id). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 8:15 am
“Ownership” means voting power in a corporation, profits interest in a partnership, or beneficial interest in a trust. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:49 am
That’s the interesting question addressed not for the first time by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Marcy Friedman in Quazzo v 9 Charlton Street Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 30097(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 10, 2019]. [read post]
