Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 601 - 620
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
This is a matter of law for the judge ([49], Lord Hoffmann) and involves drawing a line between matters in which the public is legitimately interested and matters in which the public might have an interest, but which are nevertheless not matters of public interest ([147] Baroness Hale). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
The Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 33) agreed – although for those familiar with Jacob LJ’s oft-expressed irritation with the UK Parliamentary draftsman’s insistence on translating the perfectly intelligible provisions of the EPC into mere shadows of their former self when creating the Patents Act 1977, the comments in [52] are perhaps one of the most striking aspects of the case: [52] “The British Parliamentary draftsman’s “translation” of… [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
Mr Stones’ defences of truth and publication on matter of public interest were rejected. 5RB has a summary here. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
On 20 June 2017 Macfarlane LJ heard an application for permission to appeal and a stay in the case of Lokhova v Tymula. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The Supreme Court rejected Sharp LJ’s findings that Mitting J had merely used a dictionary as check. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:15 pm
However, the primacy of the best interests of a child means that, where a child’s interests would be adversely affected, they must be given considerable weight. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:52 pm
Of course, trivia aside, behind this is a serious judgment about a serious and heartwrenching case, as the judgment in question is that of the President of the Family Division, Munby LJ, in connection with the Reporting Restrictions Orders in the case regarding the child of Allessandra Pacchieri. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
The case also included an interesting head-to-head by which the claimant sought a stay of its own claim and the defendant opposed it; the judge refused the stay, unconvinced as to the real reasons for the claimant’s request and questioning the litigation tactics at play. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
The tribunal found that the section 43(2) exemption was engaged “as both the commercial interests of the BBC and of MTM are affected” and that “there is a real and significant risk of prejudice to the commercial interests” of both. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
As we have already mentioned, on Tuesday 23 October 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Underhill V-P and Henderson LJ) handed down judgment in ABC v Telegraph Media Group [2018] EWCA Civ 2329. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
We are particularly interested in forthcoming events which readers are interested in publicising. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Given this issue required a witness of fact from each party, it will be interesting to see if Vernacare is penalised in costs (assuming that the parties do not settle on costs). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
Reserved Judgments Associated Newspapers Limited v Duchess of Sussex, heard 9-11 November 2021 (The Master of the Rolls, The President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Bean LJ) GUH v KYT, heard on 28 October 2021 (Collins Rice J) Soriano v Forensic News, heard 6 and 7 October 2021 (Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing and Warby LJ) Qatar Airways Group Q.S.C.S v Middle East News UK Limited and others heard on 4 October 2021 (Saini J) Abramovich v… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm
In the Ul Haq case, Dyson LJ refused Barons Finance and Reddy Corporation permission to appeal. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
Echoing Wilson LJ in the Court of Appeal in Radmacher, in some cases the prenuptial agreement will be a ‘compelling factor’ (para [83]). [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
The Defence as served relies on a defence of truth pursuant to s. 2 of the Defamation Act 2013 and a defence of “public interest” under s.4. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
However, Davis LJ went on to eviscerate the claim further. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
There seems to be considerable pre-release interest in the figurine: when this Kat tried to purchase one (for research purposes of course), she was informed that 'Sorry! [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Unusually, permission to appeal was granted (by Lewison LJ) on the basis of the “some other compelling reason for the appeal to be heard” limb of CPR 52.6(1), having regard to the novelty of the claim and the procedure for dealing with it, the public interest in data breaches, the number of people affected and the potential sums of money involved. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
” Lawton LJ in the same case said: “The wiping out of a litigant’s reputation may be of no consequence to anybody save himself, his family and his friends, but the wiping out of another’s, for example, a cabinet minister’s, may have consequences for the whole nation. [read post]
