Search for: "In Matter of Crouch"
Results 601 - 620
of 865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2013, 7:04 am
By Dennis Crouch Nautilus v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 10:50 am
By Dennis Crouch New patent applications are now being examined under the first-to-file rules codified in the America Invents Act of 2011. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:14 am
Crouch, Can a Third Party Challenge Section 101 Subject Matter Eligibility in the USPTO's new Post-Grant Review Procedure? [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:49 am
By Dennis Crouch Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:31 am
By Dennis Crouch Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:58 pm
§ 101 as claiming non-statutory subject matter. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:11 am
By Dennis Crouch In Yesterday's case of University of Utah v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:51 pm
By Dennis Crouch A highlight of this opinion is Footnote 1 of Judge Moore's dissenting opinion that states "The majority baldly asserts that issues of patent ownership and inventorship are not sufficiently grand for the Supreme Court to resolve in the first instance. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:55 pm
Va. 2013) (no subject matter jurisdiction). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:50 am
On appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated – finding that the record was not sufficiently clear for such a ruling as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:38 am
Standard articles or translations should be 8,000 to 12,000 words, depending on the subject matter; book reviews should be 1,000 to 3,000 words. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:07 pm
A dog bite can be a very serious matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:34 am
By Dennis Crouch Novozymes A/S v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
By Dennis Crouch In re Bimeda Research & Development (Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am
By Dennis Crouch Mylan Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 10:55 pm
By Dennis Crouch Novozymes A/S v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:13 pm
By Dennis Crouch In re Guiffrida (Fed. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:37 pm
By Dennis Crouch Myriad Genetics v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:56 pm
By Dennis Crouch Patenting Software: Ex Parte Betts [Computer Associates], 2013 WL 3327142, Appeal 2010-004256, Application 11/132,649 (PTAB 2013) ("[W]e conclude claims 14-26 encompass software without physical embodiment, i.e., software per se, which is an abstract idea and not a "process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter," as required by § 101.") [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:16 pm
By Dennis Crouch The PTAB continues to work on its 26,000+ backlog of ex parte appeals pending at the USPTO. [read post]