Search for: "In Re Armstrong"
Results 601 - 615
of 615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 9:00 am
"I don't know what the right answer is, but I do know what the wrong answer is: It is to continue doing what we're doing, when it's not working," said Michael Armstrong. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
Sjoblom: “I feel relieved that we’re out of this never-never land and that we’re moving forward in the process. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 3:11 am
” If we’re not doing well, tell us. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:46 pm
Judges, when they're on their high horses, are even worse. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:19 pm
Representing yourself -- even if you're an attorney -- is often a bad idea. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:56 am
Thomas Ford NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeCorporation Indispensable Party in Shareholder Derivative Action, Must Be a Named Defendant Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:19 am
Of course, when you throw five interceptions, as Owls quarterback Joel Armstrong did, you are not going to win.We are now 7-2 in predicting the winners and 4-2 against the spread.Update: South Florida jumped to a quick 14-0 lead and won 24-7 in a game that was scoreless in the second half because of inept coaching by East Carolina. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:53 am
The first is by Jennifer Mnookin (UCLA and LawCulture), and the second is by Walter Sinott-Armstrong. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 2:26 pm
Documents and Links: Oral Argument Transcript; Commentary from the Gallery on the Oral Arguments: Zura; Armstrong; Miller; Kerr; ScotusBlog (Run by Teleflex’s Counsel) Gordon Smith; Patent Baristas; LawFont; Hawk; Brooks; Leo Stoller; Ebert; Law School Innovation; DragonFly KSR Shifts Obviousness Debate to "Mere Aggregations" and Presumptions of Non-Obviousness; Discussion of Response Briefs; Discussion of Petitioner and Supporting Amici’s… [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 6:59 am
The lawyers accused of overstating their hours and expenses responded by strenuously objecting to Judge Armstrong about the public disclosure of their billing records, which the attorneys said were confidential. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:07 pm
"If I get them trained right, they're the principals. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:23 pm
Steve Armstrong at Crim Law recently posted one more reason eyewitness ID sucks. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 4:55 pm
The items don't disappear or get cleaned out just because they're "read. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 11:15 am
In In re World Health Alternatives, Inc., Case No. 06-10166 (July 7, 2006), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that—notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s recent opinion, In re Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 432 F.3d 507 (3d Cir. 2005)—a... [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 11:15 am
In In re World Health Alternatives, Inc., Case No. 06-10166 (July 7, 2006), the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that—notwithstanding the Third Circuit’s recent opinion, In re Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 432 F.3d 507 (3d Cir. 2005)—a... [read post]
