Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 601 - 620
of 5,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
Aranda (1965) 63 Cal.2d 518, 529-531 (Aranda), abrogated in part by Cal. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 1:47 pm
They think you're "married" even though you're not. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:09 am
Neither In re Tobacco II Cases, supra, 46 Cal.4th 298, nor Massachusetts Mutual, supra, 97 Cal.App.4th 1282, compel a different result.Kaldenbach v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:29 am
You're even less psyched to be doing so for shooting someone you like and had no intention of harming.Consider this argument 45 of 2300 against pulling a drive-by. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 4:02 pm
If you're looking for a California case that refuses to enforce a "browsewrap" arbitration and class action waiver clause, this is the opinion for you.Not only is the holding what you're looking for, but it's 50+ pages of history and precedent and everything you ever wanted to know about the validity of arbitration agreements in analogous situations.Comprehensive, to say the least. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:58 pm
When you're driving with a .17 (-plus) BAC at 8:00 a.m., plus have some weed in your system -- and run a red light and kill someone, you're going to get 25-plus to life. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm
Maybe they're true, maybe they're not. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:20 am
for No. 5, they're going to find out the rest. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
"Usually if you amend an opinion to distinguish a case or two, you say more than just that you find them inapt, without explaining why they're so-not-apt.But apparently Justice Ikola thinks that simply calling them inapt is sufficient here. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
In In re Ethan C. (2012) 54 Cal. 4th 610, 143 Cal. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
Cal. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:59 pm
They can file initiate an appeal when they're the defendant. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Cal. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:33 pm
The precise answer is that no, the recipient of Medi-Cal benefits does not have to re-pay the benefits received. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
Cal. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
You're not going to get a lot of sympathy from the Court of Appeal if you're a big Oxycontin user who lives in a crash pad in Ventura County and your five-year old child dies from overdosing on Oxy. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:41 pm
Right now we're just talking about out-of-pocket expenses being "reasonable" even though they exceed market value. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
Yep, it's four times more likely that they're correlated. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 6:36 am
Cal.): 78 State Motion for Reconsideration.pdfDownload 81-1 Tribe Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload 82 State Motion for Sanctions.pdfDownload 84 State Opposition to 81.pdfDownload 86 Tribe Opposition to 78.pdfDownload 87 Tribe Opposition to 82.pdfDownload 89 Reply ISO 78.pdfDownload 90 Reply ISO 81.pdfDownload 91 Reply ISO 82.pdfDownload 95 DCT Order re Sanctions.pdfDownload 96 DCT Order re Motion for Reconsideration .pdfDownload 97 DCT… [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:57 pm
You're not covered. [read post]
