Search for: "In Re King Properties" Results 601 - 620 of 1,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2009, 12:41 am by Lawrence Solum
King, we find that the right to bear arms for the defense of person and property—independent of its enumeration in the Second Amendment—was considered a privilege or immunity of citizenship in 1868. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 12:19 am by Tessa Shepperson
The property is owned by Southwark Council and was formerly a family home. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:53 pm
John King (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (5) (link to cases): Tracy L. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
xkcd breaks it down: I think the problem of content owner-defined rights may be connected to the numerus clausus principle as ably elucidated by Thomas Merrill and Henry Smith: we limit types of property more than we limit the customizability of contracts, so that people can more easily tell what they’re dealing with when they encounter a piece of property. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by William Carleton
If you're really, really going to be about ending the escalating patent wars, you simply have to talk about disarmament. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The brief is on behalf of 27 intellectual property law and constitutional law professors: Jack Balkin (Yale Law School) Barton Beebe (NYU School of Law) Stacey L. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:20 am
  "It says especially to Congress that we're tired of the out-of-control illegal immigration problem. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by Tessa Shepperson
that they can re-claim their properties back quickly where there are serious rent arrears or anti-social behaviour. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Dalhuisen at the University of California – Berkeley and King’s College London. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:39 pm by Lara
How dare you use red, white & blue to market your properties, Alan Shelor! [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:59 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Notably, Eikenberry filed just days ago an amended complaint attempting to re-plead the existence of an oral partnership. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Simon Fodden
We’re the last of the St. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:05 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Different rules apply for losses when property is held for business or investment purposes. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by Ted Tjaden
” If I recall correctly (and this shows you I am too lazy to actually re-read the case I just cited to), the union was not necessarily offside on trade-mark infringement but were offside on copyright infringement (and their freedom of expression rights were held to not have justified such infringement since they could have expressed their frustration with Michelin in ways that did not infringe Michelin’s intellectual property rights). [read post]