Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices." Results 601 - 620 of 14,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2008, 7:50 am
I think that they're in good faith with what they're trying to do. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
Justice Alito wrote the opinion of the court, and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
In other news at the court, the justices today issued a summary opinion in the case of a Nevada death-row inmate who alleged that the judge in his state trial was biased. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 In Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Limiting Government Interference with Abortion, (FL Sup. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
This is not to say that Taney was "correct," but only that it is patently "incorrect" to say that his opinion, and the opinions of the concurring justices, were any more legally problematic (or more "political") than, say, John Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
  That's right.Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye writes the majority opinion, but also authors a short concurrence as well -- one that's joined by the other conservative justices -- that says that X and Y don't make doctrinal sense; i.e., that they're inconsistent. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm by Jason Mazzone
But Justice Scalia, in a dissenting opinion in Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 586, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas, thought not. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If you're in Austin, the hearing will be in room E2.010 in the capitol. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:07 pm by Record on Appeal
Yesterday, October 19, 2011, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion authored by Justice McKenna in In re Attorney's Fees of David Bettencourt, SCAP No. 30616, holding that an administrative judge's decision to summarily reduce attorneys' fees incurred by court-appointed counsel was inappropriate. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by William G. Ross
Such ambition could severely damage the Court because the perception that any Justice was adjusting her opinions to suit her presidential ambitions easily could erode public faith in judicial independence. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am by Douglas Berman
” Yang noted that the “thrust” language came from a 2010 Supreme Court opinion, Abbott v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Not a single Justice of the Supreme Court thinks the Ninth is correct. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:26 am by Bridget Crawford
Rewritten opinions may be re-imagined majority opinions, dissents, or concurrences, as appropriate to the court. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm by Brian Huddleston
I think we could legitimately argue that the majority opinion in Bowers v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:15 am
The judges put a lot of thought and time into writing their opinion, and they're not likely to undo it at this late stage. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:30 am by Marin K. Levy
Re has been doing the academy and the judiciary a service in recent years by writing several articles and a scholarly amicus brief on the foundational question of how certain opinions come to bind others. [read post]