Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
In the said case, this court further held that where a public interest litigation alleging that certain workmen are living in bondage and under inhuman conditions is initiated it is not expected of the Government that it should raise preliminary objection that no fundamental rights of the petitioners or the workmen on whose behalf the petition has been filed, have been infringed. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
To the extent that the duty requires hosts to monitor for illegality, that departs from the long-standing principle embodied in Article 15 of the eCommerce Directive prohibiting the imposition of general monitoring obligations. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Administrative: Set Program policies with regard to Cyber Group meetings and broader conference management: coordination, logistics, and contacts with participants. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Private Ordering. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:09 pm
Is this the reason why you call it evil? [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 3:00 am
If you're ordered not to utter any words to a juror, then follow the court's order. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Hasahn Carter, UCD Rockland CR-21-659, Active Retired Maine Supreme Judicial Court Justice Jeffrey Hjelm issued a written order dismissing an indictment for robbery based on Counterman. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
” The provider, Microsoft, recently filed objections to the magistrate’s decision in the District Court. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Moreover, she points out, they’re not even Trump’s papers because he’s not in possession of them. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
The Act has two basic objectives: To ensure that potential investors receive the relevant financial, and all other significant information concerning securities being offered for public sale, and To prohibit deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities.1 In order to achieve these stated objectives, the Act requires the registration of companies’ securities. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Can employees with religious objections sue the company? [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Dissent: We're only talking about an hour here. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Wecht, No. 07-4767 In a trial accusing a public official of misusing his office for private financial gain, an order to withhold from the public the names and addresses of prospective and trial jurors is vacated where: 1) the collateral order doctrine granted jurisdiction to hear the appeal; 2) intervenors-media companies had standing to challenge the order; 3) there is a presumptive First Amendment right to obtain the names of jurors prior to empanelment, which… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Episcopalians who are united in our desire to remain members in good standing in The Episcopal Church (TEC) and the Anglican Communion. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:13 am
Then, I will explore how microcredit can be applied to the poor in present day society in the United States and the barriers that stand in its way. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
In an era in which junk scientists respond to public expressions of skepticism with libel suits, this could not stand. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Natural Res. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
SKJONSBY Opinion of the Court – 4 – interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:30 am
” This reality is also baked into U.S. legislation, including what has become routine congressional affirmation that it is U.S. policy to regard “the prevention of atrocities as in its national interest. [read post]
