Search for: "In re GARLAND" Results 601 - 620 of 807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2016, 8:54 pm by Bill Otis
Judge Garland is a smart and decent man so far as I have any reason to believe, but that is not the point. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:31 pm by Andrew Hamm
The American people may well elect a President who decides to nominate Judge Garland for Senate consideration. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:29 pm by Andrew Hamm
Circuit, and our current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, once said, “Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you’re in a difficult area. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court.In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct, 769 F.3d 762 (Aug. 12, 2014). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts Jr. as saying, “any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you’re in a difficult area. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena
” Lumpkin told the Daily Beast that “you need a network to defeat a network, so we’re going to take a network approach to our messaging. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:59 am by Bill Otis
Clinton to disavow Judge Garland, or even whether she might, for political purposes, pledge to re-nominate him should she win (and not get indicted, which we also don't know). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:57 am by David Bernstein
The constitutional text, therefore, does not require the Senate to either hold hearings on Merrick Garland, nor to have a vote on his nomination. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:50 am by SHG
  Upon re-reading Garland’s post, I think I misread it, and Judge Garland is, indeed, Jewish. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
In the coming days, you’re going to hear a lot of efforts to make Garland sound controversial. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:00 am by Cody M. Poplin
Today, President Obama announced Merrick Garland as his nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:24 pm by Cody M. Poplin, Elina Saxena
Editor’s Note: Lawfare’s Headlines and Commentary will be at the beach next week. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” So, the Justice wondered, “How do we know they’re not monsters? [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:30 am by Jack Goldsmith
I was honored to be invited to give a keynote speech at an Intelligence Community legal conference last Wednesday, May 6. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:24 am by Sebastian Brady
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the NSA’s warrantless bulk collection of Americans’ phone records under Section 215 of the Patriot Act is illegal. [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:12 am by SHG
  You’re allowed to be as wrong as you wanna be. [read post]