Search for: "In re Grand Jury Proceedings" Results 601 - 620 of 755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
In re: Jeffrey Beard, et.al. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am by Susan Brenner
A grand jury indicted Hull on 1 count of possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although misdemeanor accusatories are not based on grand jury proceedings (usually), you are entitled to a Bill of Particulars in those cases too. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
AmClyde, 511 U.S. 202 (1994), and Boca Grande Club, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
Romero’s FELA claim proceeded to trial, and the jury awarded him $862,500 in damages, which included $82,500 for past pain and suffering and $60,000 for future pain and suffering. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The District Attorney is having a state agency work the case, and the Grand Jury make the call on proceeding with charges. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:59 pm by Mark Bennett
Leyva, 513 F.2d 774, 776 (5th Cir. 1975); In re: Grand Jury Proceedings, Taylor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:00 am by Robert Arcamona
  At that point, Bonilla was set to appear before a state inquisition, similar to a Grand Jury proceeding. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
– Associated Press and fair use (Spicy IP) Copyright office: Copyright royalty judges have subpoena power over non-witnesses (Copyright Litigation Blog) International law: Wrestling the dead hand of history – Panel on Nazi looted art (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court E D Pennsylvania: $20 million copyright infringement jury award upheld in case concerning filched sales materials later used to poach clients: Graham v Haughey… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:35 am by Russ Bensing
Colon that the indictment must include the mens rea requirements for various crimes, some courts have held that the indictment can’t be amended to include that, because the defendant is entitled to grand jury indictment, and if an element isn’t included, there’s no indication that the grand jury ever considered it. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm by B.W. Barnett
After the presentment to the grand jury of an indictment on the offense at issue, article 32.01 is no longer applicable. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:24 am
“Shortly after the filing of Starwood’s complaint, the government initiated an investigation into these allegations,” Bharara’s office said in the filing.A six-month stay of the exchange of evidence in the case would prevent the government’s investigation from being compromised by the more liberal rules controlling the flow of information in civil lawsuits, Bharara’s office said.Hilton issued a statement in April acknowledging receipt of a federal grand… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
"As an example, a trustee of the State University pleaded guilty of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, a Class A misdemeanor. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm by cdw
LEXIS 265(La. 02/10/2010) “[T]his case is remanded to the district court with directions to consider relator’s request to discharge counsel and to represent himself during post-conviction proceedings, i.e., whether relator maintains his desire to represent [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
"It cannot be conceded that a State, as parens patriae, may institute judicial proceedings to protect citizens of the United States from the operation of the statutes thereof. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm by Rusty Shackleford
However, in December of 2009 the presiding judge found that prosecutors had tried to prevent key witnesses for the defense from testifying, leaked information about the grand jury proceedings to the media, and improperly contacted defense attorneys. [read post]