Search for: "In re Special Justice" Results 601 - 620 of 8,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 6:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
They’re reported to include “willful retention of national defense information, corruptly concealing doc[ument]s, conspiracy to obstruct justice, [and] false statements. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:51 am by SHG
© 2010 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 6:21 pm by Jeralyn
Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed a new Indictment against Donald Trump in the January 6 case in the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:15 am by Kim Krawiec
His current research focuses on political authority, social justice, criminal law, and punishment. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:56 am
  New York County Supreme Court Justice Alice Schlesinger disagreed with Allstate's position, finding that the 20-day deadline of CPLR § 7503(c) to commence the special proceeding did apply to Allstate's non-coverage defense: However, citing to In re Matarasso v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:29 am
I've been tremendously honored lately to be mentioned in some of my fellow bloggers' (Grits for Breakfast, Austin Criminal Defense, Deliberations [edit: and Simple Justice]) posts about the ten best criminal justice blogs. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:52 am by David Lat
Adli Mansour, chief justice of the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt, takes over as the nation’s interim leader. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:03 am
First, our specialized Court of Chancery. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 5:01 am by Vera Mironova
Harmful Counterterrorism Justice Unfortunately, counterterrorism justice in Iraq is leading to major problems and pushing the country deeper into conflict because the justice process does not allow for reconciliation and does not further security goals. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 8:06 am by David Oscar Markus
Price's disclosures, which were filed under federal whistleblower-protection laws and are now in the hands of the House and Senate Judiciary committees, add to the mounting questions about how Supreme Court justices and their families financially benefit from their special status, an area that Senate Democrats are vowing to investigate after a series of disclosure lapses by the justices themselves. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 12:06 pm
It never actually required a specially designed rule to admit it independent of the statute. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:31 am by Jon Hyman
’ And nobody would consider eyeglasses or a wristwatch or some of this other specialized equipment to be clothes. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Legal Talk Network
We talk about misbehaving lawyers a lot, but there must be a full moon (per statute a moon "at least 95 percent wholly spherical when measured by appropriate telescopic instruments") or something for lawyers right now because they're wild this week! [read post]