Search for: "In the Interest of James L. v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am
L. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
L. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
& Mary L. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Recently published sports law scholarship includes:Jessica L. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Friendly of interest. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
” Elsewhere in the news the Chicago Tribune’s David Savage and James Vicini of Reuters James Vicini both discuss Astrue v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:01 pm
James In the case of Collins v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
In the interest of time and space, I haven’t discussed the municipal court candidates, but Smartvoter.org lists them. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
V 16. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
And Simon Johnson and James Kwak, who write one of my favorite blogs, Baseline Scenario, also chimed in on the state of affairs with, “13 Bankers,” and yes, I reviewed it too. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
” James Mets – The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
Databases Copyright Litig., 05-5943-cv(L) (2d Cir. [read post]
