Search for: "Irvin v. Irvin" Results 601 - 620 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:50 am by INFORRM
The Mosley case followed earlier High Court battles that saw the courts establish the balancing exercise between Article 10 and Article 8, in particular the House of Lords decision in Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:32 pm by J. Ric Gass
Since my practice consists of two-thirds defense and one-third plaintiffs (including one nine figure verdict for a plaintiff) I can give you a view from both sides of the “v”. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 7:04 am by Elin Hofverberg
Professor Kaye of the University of California, Irvine has argued that this lack of clarification regarding the relationship between the Community Standards and human rights standards could be significantly improved if Facebook expressly integrated human rights principles into its Community Standards, instead of using human rights as a discretionary, secondary tool to assess Facebook’s actions restricting speech. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am by Lawrence Taylor
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Knaplund, “Adoptions Shall Not Be Recognized”: The Unintended Consequences for Dynasty Trusts, 7 UC Irvine L. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla  Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM  - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) ·         Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law   ·        … [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]